I Am Talkative
Better at being heard

Storytelling

Humour that works

Being funny on purpose is a craft with rules, and most of them are about structure rather than material.

Performers captivating the audience at an evening indoor event, rich in ambiance and energy.
Performers captivating the audience at an evening indoor event, rich in ambiance and energy. · Photo via Pexels

People who are reliably funny are not simply born that way — they have learned a set of structural habits that can be described.

The basic structure

Almost all humour shares a shape.

A setup that establishes an expectation.

A turn that violates it in a way that is, in retrospect, consistent with what came before.

The technical account is the incongruity-resolution model, and it holds across most forms of verbal humour.

Which means the setup must genuinely create the expectation, and the turn must be both unexpected and immediately makes sense.

Failures are generally one or the other: an expectation not established, or a turn that is merely random.

Word order

The most learnable technique.

The funny word goes last.

Everything after the turn is dead weight and reduces the laugh.

Which means restructuring sentences so the surprising element lands at the end, and then stopping.

The most common amateur error is explaining after the punchline, which converts a laugh into a nod.

Brevity

Which is not a cliché.

Every unnecessary word in a setup dilutes the payoff.

Which means cutting the setup to the minimum that establishes the expectation.

Detail that is not doing work should go.

And a joke that requires a long setup needs the setup to be independently interesting, since the audience is investing.

Timing

What it actually consists of.

A pause before the turn, which signals that something is coming and builds the expectation.

A pause after, which allows the laugh to happen rather than talking over it.

Not rushing, which is what nerves produce and which kills more jokes than bad material.

And letting a laugh finish before continuing, since talking through it means the next line is lost and the laugh is cut short.

Specificity

The reliable amplifier.

Specific nouns are funnier than general ones.

A named object, a precise number, a particular brand — these land where the generic version does not.

Which is why the advice to be concrete applies to humour more strongly than to anything else.

And why observational humour works: it is specific enough that people recognise it.

Self-deprecation

The safest form and the one with limits.

It lowers status, which makes an audience comfortable, and it cannot offend anyone else.

Its limits: too much undermines credibility, particularly for people whose authority is already questioned; and it becomes tiresome if it is the only register.

Which means using it early to establish warmth, and then having something else.

What not to do

The reliable failures.

Announcing that something funny is coming.

Laughing at your own joke before the audience does.

Explaining a joke that did not land.

Humour at the expense of anyone with less power than you, which reads as unkindness rather than wit.

Jokes about the audience's identity.

Anything you have not tested.

And material recycled from elsewhere, which people recognise.

When it does not land

Recovery.

Move on immediately without acknowledgement, which is the professional approach and which works.

Or acknowledge it once, briefly and lightly, and move on.

Do not repeat it louder.

Do not explain it.

Do not apologise at length.

And note it afterwards, since a joke that fails twice should be retired.

Cultural and contextual limits

Worth taking seriously.

Humour travels badly: irony in particular is read differently across cultures, and sarcasm is frequently taken literally.

Wordplay does not survive translation.

References require shared knowledge.

Which means international audiences call for observational and situational humour rather than verbal or referential humour.

And the general rule that if you are uncertain whether something will land, it should be tested rather than risked.

Developing it

How people get better.

Note what makes you laugh and why, structurally.

Write down lines that worked, since they are forgotten.

Test material in low-stakes settings.

Notice what kind of humour suits you, since forcing a register that is not yours is obvious.

And accept that a hit rate well below half is normal even for professionals, which removes the pressure to be funny continuously.

Rafael Duarte
Voice & Delivery, I Am Talkative

Rafael trained as a voice coach in theatre and now works mostly with people who dislike the sound of their own recordings.

More from Rafael →

Also by Rafael Duarte

Storytelling

Structuring a longer story

Anything beyond a few minutes needs a shape the listener can feel, and there are only a handful that work.

Esme Carrington··3 min read

Storytelling

Telling a story to a hostile room

Narrative works differently when the audience is sceptical, and the usual techniques can make things worse.

Esme Carrington··3 min read

Languages

Sounding like yourself in another language

People frequently report having a different personality in a second language, and the reasons are more practical than mystical.

Rafael Duarte··3 min read

Voice & Accent

Silence and what it does

The pause is the most powerful device available to a speaker and the one people are least willing to use.

Rafael Duarte··3 min read

Writing

Editing someone else

Editing another person is a relationship as much as a craft, and most of the damage is done by editors improving prose that was fine.

Mei-Lin Chow··3 min read