Conversation
Difficult conversations
The preparation determines the outcome, and the most common error is having the conversation you rehearsed rather than the one in front of you.

Conversations that are avoided become harder, and the avoidance is generally about not knowing how to start rather than about the subject.
Preparing
What to decide beforehand.
What outcome you actually want, which is frequently different from what you want to say.
What the other person's perspective plausibly is, stated in a way they would recognise.
What you might be wrong about.
What you will say in the first thirty seconds, which is the hardest part.
What you will not say, particularly the things that would feel satisfying and would derail it.
And what your minimum acceptable outcome is, so that you know when the conversation has succeeded.
The setting
Which matters more than people assume.
Private, unhurried, and not immediately before either party has to be somewhere.
Not at the end of a difficult day.
Face to face where possible, since written exchanges escalate and remove tone.
Side by side rather than across a desk, for some conversations, which reduces the confrontational geometry.
And with an agreed time, rather than ambushing someone.
Opening it
The part that determines the rest.
Name the subject directly and briefly, without a long preamble that increases anxiety.
State it as your perspective rather than as fact: "I have noticed" rather than "you always".
Describe behaviour rather than character: "the report was late three times" rather than "you are unreliable".
State the impact, which is the part that makes it meaningful.
And then stop talking and let them respond, which is the hardest instruction.
The middle
Where it is won or lost.
Listen to the response properly, rather than waiting to deliver the next prepared point.
Expect the conversation to go somewhere you did not anticipate, and follow it there rather than returning to your script.
Ask questions: what is your view, what am I missing, what would you do.
Acknowledge anything valid before disagreeing.
Separate the problem from the person.
And resist the urge to fill silences, which frequently precede the more honest part of what someone has to say.
When it escalates
Practical measures.
Slow down and lower your voice, since matching escalation guarantees it continues.
Name what is happening: "this is getting heated — can we take a minute".
Pause and reconvene, which is legitimate and generally produces a better outcome than pushing through.
Return to the shared objective, if one exists.
And accept that not every conversation resolves in one attempt, which removes the pressure to force it.
Giving criticism
A specific case.
Be specific about behaviour and its effect, since general criticism cannot be acted on.
Be timely, since criticism of something months old is unusable.
Be private.
Ask for their perspective before concluding, since you may be missing something.
Agree what changes, specifically, and when you will review it.
And avoid the sandwich construction of criticism between compliments, which is widely taught and which people see through, discounting the praise as packaging.
Receiving criticism
The harder half.
Listen without defending, which requires deliberate effort since the instinct is immediate.
Ask for specifics if it is general.
Ask what would look different if it were fixed.
Thank them, since giving it was uncomfortable and the alternative is not being told.
Take time before responding substantively if it is significant.
And separate the accuracy of the criticism from the manner of its delivery, which are different questions and are frequently conflated.
Conversations about personal matters
Where different rules apply.
Ask before advising, since most people want the thing acknowledged rather than solved.
Do not compare it to your own experience immediately, which redirects attention.
Tolerate distress rather than trying to stop it, which is uncomfortable and is what being supported feels like.
Follow up afterwards, which is what distinguishes support from a single conversation.
And know your limits: some conversations need a professional rather than a friend, and saying so kindly is a form of help.
Afterwards
Which is frequently skipped.
Summarise what was agreed, briefly and in writing where it matters, since memories diverge.
Do what you said you would do.
Follow up at the agreed point rather than letting it lapse.
And note what worked and what did not, since these conversations recur and the preparation improves.
Also by Esme Carrington
- The stories organisations tell about themselvesStorytelling
- Conversations with people much older or youngerConversation
- Speaking to cameraPublic Speaking
- Structuring a longer storyStorytelling





